Thesis ledger
Dated forecasts and market interpretations with assessment criteria and subsequent outcomes. This records research, not portfolio performance.
Publication range: 2 Jul 2026 – 15 Oct 2026. Source: Hawk Thorne research record. Thesis descriptions retain the content recorded in the ledger.
Forecasts
23Claims about future events, assessed against a stated condition and time horizon.
- Held
- 8
- Broke
- 8
- Unresolved
- 0
- Awaiting assessment
- 7
Interpretations
117Assessments of current conditions. New evidence can sustain, revise or retire an interpretation. These do not contribute to forecast accuracy.
- Sustained
- 7
- Revised
- 19
- Retired
- 10
- Awaiting assessment
- 52
- Historical assessments
- 29
Assessment rules and forecast calibration
Since 27 July 2026, forecasts and interpretations follow separate assessment rules. Earlier interpretations graded against price thresholds remain in the history and are excluded from calibration.
Declared probabilities compared with assessed outcomes. Brier is the mean squared error; a lower score indicates less error within this sample. A small sample does not establish future forecasting accuracy.
Forecast calibration
scored forecasts: 17 · Brier: 0.252
The sample includes only resolved forecasts with a recorded probability. Interpretations and unresolved entries are excluded.
The dollar's failure to rally despite fading Fed cut odds and a 37bp firmer 12-month priced path reflects a still-stretched euro and yen short base absorbing the hawkish repricing through covering flow, not a dollar structurally capped.
What would prove it wrong
If the Dollar Index breaks decisively below its 20-day low of 100.5 even as Fed cut odds continue to fade and yields hold firm, the hawkish-hold repricing thesis fails.
Read analysis#How it settled
DX-Y.NYB traded below 100.5 on 2026-07-30 (session low 99.86)
This week's earnings reactions in Netflix, Intuitive Surgical, Regions Financial and SpaceX reflect four distinct mechanisms rather than a broadening earnings-quality problem, and the S&P e-mini's extending speculative short (unlike the covering seen in Nasdaq and Russell futures) marks a genuine split in positioning rather than confirmation of contagion.
What would prove it wrong
If the S&P 500 breaks below its 20-day low of 7354.02 or the Nasdaq Composite breaks below its 20-day low of 25297.62 on renewed selling tied to this week's earnings names, the mechanism-split read fails and a broader earnings-quality deterioration becomes the better story.
Read analysis#How it settled
^GSPC traded below 7354.02 on 2026-07-29 (session low 7313.92)
Fading Fed cut expectations, an EXTREME fiscal gravity read (heavy net issuance against a TGA drawdown) and WTI crude at a fresh 20-day high above $80 are outvoting genuine eurozone and US disinflation data, so the rates path is being set by supply and energy, not the inflation trend.
What would prove it wrong
If the 2-year Treasury yield falls in the sessions following 17 July 2026 despite the EXTREME fiscal gravity read and WTI's fresh high, the supply-and-energy-dominant framing fails.
Read analysis#How it settled
no CL=F trade below 73 through 2026-08-01
EUR/PLN and USD/PLN broke to fresh 20-day highs on 17 July 2026 despite softer core inflation, and the move looks driven by broad dollar strength (EUR/USD down to 1.1444) rather than any repricing of Poland's disinflation path.
What would prove it wrong
If EUR/PLN and USD/PLN retrace back inside their prior 20-day ranges (below roughly 4.3237 and 3.79 respectively) once the 20-21 July GUS employment, wages, industrial production, PPI and retail sales data land, the move is confirmed as a global dollar and rates event rather than a domestic repricing.
Read analysis#How it settled
EURPLN=X did not trade below 4.28 through 2026-07-25
June CPI at 2.5% confirms genuine disinflation against the NBP's own target, but a fresh Iran-driven fuel spike is already undercutting the July print, and only WIG20/WIG-BANKI (not EUR/PLN or the reference rate) show any sign of pricing that tension so far.
What would prove it wrong
If EUR/PLN and WIG20 show no distinct reaction once the 20-21 July GUS employment, wages, industrial production and retail sales data land against this softer CPI base, the oil-and-global-rates trading pattern is confirmed yet again and the domestic data channel remains dormant.
Read analysis#How it settled
EURPLN=X traded above 4.3285 on 2026-07-17 (session high 4.34811)
WTI crude's muted reaction to the confirmed 15 July 2026 Centcom strikes on Iran, a 0.60% move against a 0.41% typical band, alongside a managed-money net short at its widest since 23 June 2026 (99.4th percentile on the 3-year window), shows the market has stopped treating Iran escalation headlines as fresh information and is instead pricing a structurally looser physical balance.
What would prove it wrong
If WTI crude breaks above its 20-day high of 79.34 on any further escalation headline within the next 48 hours, the desensitization read fails and the acute risk-premium framing returns.
Read analysis#How it settled
horizon elapsed without a machine-checkable falsifier
US strikes on Iran on 15 July arrived alongside a soft core PPI print (0.2% vs 0.3%) and a China Q2 GDP miss (4.3% from 5.0%), yet the S&P 500 rose 0.24% and WTI fell 0.79%, so the market is pricing the escalation as contained and letting a cooling global cycle steer; the one holdout is the front end, with the 2-year yield at the 100th percentile of its year and 40.5bp of tightening still priced at 12 months.
What would prove it wrong
If WTI breaks above its 20-day high of 79.34 and the VIX moves meaningfully above 17.16 in the sessions following the 15 July strikes, the contained-escalation read fails and the energy-shock framing resumes as the dominant story.
Read analysis#How it settled
CL=F traded above 79.34 on 2026-07-16 (session high 80.87)
Broad short-covering in Nasdaq Mini and Russell 2000 futures, alongside a strong NY Fed manufacturing beat, signals a soft-landing rotation into cyclicals and small caps that coexists uneasily with unresolved single-name tech risk from IBM's earnings collapse and Apple's KeyBanc downgrade.
What would prove it wrong
If Nasdaq Mini and Russell 2000 futures resume net-short building in the next COT report despite continued strong data surprises, or the S&P 500 breaks below its 20-day low of 7354.02 on renewed tech-earnings contagion, the short-covering-driven rotation thesis fails.
Read analysis#How it settled
^GSPC traded below 7354.02 on 2026-07-29 (session low 7313.92)
On 14 July 2026 the Iran risk premium migrated from crude to precious metals: WTI's 0.9% gain is capped by the desk's looser-balances read and its 20-day ceiling, while gold's 2.41% and silver's 3.41% move price the same Hormuz shock off low, lightly-positioned books (gold COT index 29.4, silver 18.7) with room to run, though a softening pre-CPI dollar is a live confound.
What would prove it wrong
If gold and silver give back the 14 July 2026 gains within one to two sessions while WTI keeps extending on Hormuz disruption headlines, the metals-as-cleaner-hedge read fails and the move was a dollar wobble, not a haven bid.
Read analysis#How it settled
SI=F traded below 57.6 on 2026-07-15 (session low 56.9)
IBM's escalation from a 17% to a 25%+ single-day decline confirms the earnings miss the desk flagged earlier on 14 July 2026, but the distinct mechanisms behind IBM's, Ericsson's and Dometic's misses, plus the still-muted 0.35% S&P 500 futures reaction, keep the idiosyncratic read intact over the broadening-deterioration alternative.
What would prove it wrong
If Ericsson, Dometic or another same-week miss triggers follow-through selling that drags the Russell 2000 below its 20-day low of 2917.98 or the Nasdaq Composite below its 20-day low of 25297.62, the idiosyncratic read fails and a broadening earnings-quality problem becomes the more defensible story.
Read analysis#How it settled
^IXIC traded below 25297.6 on 2026-07-17 (session low 25250.6)
June CPI's decline to 3.5% year on year, with the core index falling outright to 336.07, is a genuine disinflation signal that survived a real Hormuz supply shock rather than a forecast tiebreaker, but the 2-year yield's 99.6th percentile reading and 40.5bp of priced tightening at 12 months show the front end has not yet repriced to reflect it.
What would prove it wrong
If the 2-year yield eases meaningfully and priced tightening odds fall after the 15 July PPI print and Warsh's testimony, disinflation has won cleanly; if the yield holds near its current extreme while WTI's gain persists, energy-driven reflation remains the dominant priced force despite the CPI print.
Read analysis#How it settled
horizon elapsed without a machine-checkable falsifier
The Dollar Index's failure to hold gains despite a 17-month-high 2-year yield reflects Waller's dovish 2021-mistake framing being read by the market as more likely to guide policy than the hawkish, oil-driven rate-hike chatter, with euro, yen, Swiss franc and Canadian dollar shorts all covering in the same week as corroborating flow.
What would prove it wrong
If the Dollar Index resumes a sustained rally alongside continued short-end yield increases through Warsh's testimony on 15 July 2026 and the same day's PPI print, without further COT short-covering in euro or yen positioning, the dovish-repricing thesis fails.
Read analysis#How it settled
DX-Y.NYB did not trade above 101.61 through 2026-07-22